Optimization of elstomeric micro-fluidic valve dimensions using non-linear finite element methods

Authors

  • H Khawaja
  • I Raouf
  • K Parvez
  • A Scherer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1260/175095409788837847

Abstract

We use a nonlinear finite element (FE) method model to compare, optimize and determine the limits for useful geometries of microfluidic valves in elastomer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Simulations have been performed with the aim of finding the optimal shape, size and location of pressurization that minimizes the pressure required to operate the valve. One important constraint governing the design parameters is that the stresses should be within elastic limits, so that the component remains safe from any type of structural failure. To obtain reliable results, non-linear stress analysis was performed using the Mooney-Rivlin 9 parameter approximation which is based on the Hyper Elastic Material Model. A 20 noded brick element was used for the development of FE model. Mesh sensitivity analysis was also performed to assess the quality of the results. The simulations were performed with commercially available FE modeling software, developed by ANSYS Inc. to determine the effect of varying different geometric parameters on the performance of micro-fluidic valves. The aim of this work is to determine the geometry of the channel crosssection that would result in the largest deflection for the least applied pressure, i.e. to minimize the pressure needed to operate the valve.

References

Kangsun Lee et al, Fabrication of round channels using the surface tension of PDMS and its application to a 3D serpentine mixer, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2007, 17, 1533-1541. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/17/8/016

Kurt Miller, Testing Elastomers for Hyperelastic Material Models in Finite Element Analysis, Axel Products®Inc., June 2004, V3.

Marc A. Unger et al, Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography, Science, 2000, 288 (113). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5463.113

R. C. Huang and L. Anand, Non-linear mechanical behavior of the elastomer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) used in the manufacture of microfluidic devices, to be published

R. Quake et al, Experimentally validated quantitative linear model for the device physics of elastomeric microfluidic valves, Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 10 (064505). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2511688

J C Lotters et al, The mechanical properties of the rubber elastic polymer polydimethylsiloxane for sensor applications, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 1997, 7, 145-147. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/7/3/017

Mark Lee Adams, Integration of Optoelectronics and Microfluidics for biological and chemical sensing, PhD, California Institute of Technology, 2003.

Multiphysics Software, ANSYS® Inc. Version 11.0.

Theory Reference, 1Structures, 2Hyperelastic Material Models, 3Non-Linear Analysis, ANSYS® Inc. Version 11.0.

Documentation, 1Structural Analysis Guide, and 2Verification Manuals, ANSYS® Inc. Release 11.0

Mario M et al, Hyperelastic constitutive modeling under finite strain, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2004, 41, 5327-5350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.03.016

E. Cosola et al, A general framework for identification of hyper-elastic membranes with moiré techniques and multi-point simulated annealing, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2008, 45, 6074-6099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.019

Ordieres-Meré a et al, Finite element analysis of the hyper-elastic contact problem in automotive door sealing, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2008, 354, 5331-5333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.04.056

Zhongbing Huang et al, Equilibrium of drops on inclined fibers, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science2008, 330 (2009), 399-403.

Published

2009-06-30

How to Cite

Khawaja, H., Raouf, I., Parvez, K., & Scherer, A. (2009). Optimization of elstomeric micro-fluidic valve dimensions using non-linear finite element methods. The International Journal of Multiphysics, 3(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1260/175095409788837847

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>